Coase Colored Glasses


Archive for March 2nd, 2010


Utah Bill would criminalize illegal miscarriages and abortion

Gov. Herbert of Utah currently has Bill 12 on his desk that if signed would make intentional miscarriages punishable by law. This legislation came about when a 17 year old girl who was 7 months pregnant paid a man $150 to beat her up in hopes that it would result in her having a miscarriage and the baby dying. This was an irresponsible and desperate attempt that has now resulted in swift legislation that if enacted could result in the investigation of many accidental miscarriages aswell. This worries many people as Marina Lowe said, “so many things can happen, and it’s all in the eye of the beholder — that’s what’s very dangerous about this legislation.” Furthermore, what’s unique about this Bill is that it punishes the woman, where previous precedent punished the individual who assisted the woman. Do you think this type of legislation is justified considering it’s based off of the actions of a desperate 17 year old girl? What if a desperate woman tries to induce a miscarriage and is seriously injured and needs medical attention, would this bill make cause her to refrain from going to the doctor out of fear of being prosecuted? Or what about others who have an actual accident which results in them having a miscarriage, does it now justify criminal investigation?  What other adverse effects would this bill cause?  As one Ms. Paltrow commented regarding this statute,  ”Anybody that desperate is not going to be deterred by this statute.” Thus, what would be the benefits of creating such legislation, if any?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/us/01abortion.html

selective incorpodumbassicity

Re today’s discussion of the second amendment: Mike Munger takes on the New York Times. . Scroll down to “The Grand Game, Handgun Edition.”

Tailgating at the Supreme Court

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/03/us/03line.html?ref=us

Apparently there are still some people who are actively interested in what the highest court in the nation is doing.  And they are willing to wait more than 26 hours to get a front row seat for the arguments.  Today (2 Mar 10) the court will be listening to arguements about Chicago’s gun control laws, most of which will probably center around the 2nd and 14th amendments.  It is coincedental that we were discussing how laws were formed today, and the court is working on defining another one for us as we spoke. Unfortantly we will most likely be done with this class before a decision is made by the ocurts.